Thus the sense of the abject complements the existence of the superego – the representative of culture, of the symbolic order: in Kristeva's aphorism, "To each ego its object, to each superego its abject." įrom Kristeva's psychoanalytic perspective, abjection is done to the part of ourselves that we exclude: the mother. The in-between, the ambiguous, the composite." Since the abject is situated outside the symbolic order, being forced to face it is an inherently traumatic experience, as with the repulsion presented by confrontation with filth, waste, or a corpse – an object which is violently cast out of the cultural world, having once been a subject. What does not respect borders, positions, rules. However, Kristeva created a distinction in the true meaning of abjection: "It is thus not the lack of cleanliness or health that causes abjection but what disturbs identity, system, and order. Kristeva claims that within the boundaries of what one defines as subject – a part of oneself – and object – something that exists independently of oneself – there resides pieces that were once categorized as a part of oneself or one's identity that has since been rejected – the abject. The "abject" exists accordingly somewhere between the concept of an object and the concept of the subject, representing taboo elements of the self barely separated off in a liminal space.
ĭrawing on the French tradition of interest in the monstrous (e.g., novelist Louis-Ferdinand Céline), and of the subject as grounded in "filth" (e.g., psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan), Julia Kristeva developed the idea of the abject as that which is rejected by or disturbs social reason – the communal consensus that underpins a social order. The concept of abjection builds on the traditional psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan. Kristeva's concept of abjection is used commonly to explain popular cultural narratives of horror, and discriminatory behavior manifesting in misogyny, homophobia, and genocide. The abject is, as such, the process that separates from one's environment what "is not me". The best representation of this concept can be imagined as one's reaction to gazing at a human cadaver, or corpse, as a direct reminder of the inevitability of death. Ībjection prevents the absolute realization of existence, completing the course of biological, social, physical, and spiritual cycles. Kristeva describes subjective horror (abjection) as the feeling when an individual experiences, or is confronted by (both mentally and as a body), what Kristeva calls one's "corporeal reality", or a breakdown in the distinction between what is Self and what is Other.
Among the most popular interpretations of abjection is Julia Kristeva's, pursued particularly in her 1980 work Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. The term has been explored in post-structuralism as that which inherently disturbs conventional identity and cultural concepts. The term abjection literally means "the state of being cast off". ( February 2020) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. The final section will study the fetishism of language, resulting in isolation from self.This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. However, there can be no escape from the symbolic order, and the conventions of suburbia are maintained. Within these, the abject is portrayed as a pantomime of death, bound to the confrontation with mortality. These events will be explored as examples of Kristeva's “primal repressions.” The second section will explore the abject and the emergence of the Real, focusing on moments of abjection in the sources. Instead, it is only when an event penetrates boredom that this state can be recognized and radicalized. This article will suggest that boredom itself cannot be perceived as a state. The first section will examine boredom as a modern phenomenon, developed from the ennui of the cities as a coping mechanism for suburbia. The focus will be on the theories of Julia Kristeva, and the short story “Attractive Modern Homes,” by Elizabeth Bowen, the novel Revolutionary Road by Richard Yates, and Blue Velvet, directed by David Lynch. This article will apply a psychoanalytical reading to suburbia, claiming that boredom is the trigger of abjection.
0 kommentar(er)
